🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial policy to ban social media access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples around the globe. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and guardians are watching with great interest to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Movement

In Europe, a growing group of states are considering parallel measures.

• Denmark plans a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister arguing that phones and apps are "stealing our kids' innocence". The policy is expected to be formalized in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is set to introduce a age restriction of 15, citing the need to safeguard the young from the "power of the AI".
• The Irish government is developing a digital ID system to verify the user details of social media account holders. Officials have suggested that an Australian-model ban could be "a potential measures on the table".
• In Spain, the president has called on lawmakers to pass a law lifting the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has recommended a similar step, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has urged families to prevent their children from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has passed a non-binding statement supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 unless a parent decides otherwise is granted. Although it warns of the "addictive" design of these services, the resolution does not establish mandatory rules.

"A clear age barrier is a good foundation," said one parliamentarian supporting the measure.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Approach

Across Britain, the administration has not ruled out a possible ban, arguing that "no option is off the table" but maintaining any decision must be "grounded in robust evidence".

Last year, momentum built behind a legislative effort to introduce limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end modified. However, the administration committed to further research the topic.

Charities have raised apprehensions. An organization founded by the relatives of a teenager who was lost after encountering harmful online content suggests that a simple age ban could fail to improve online safety and could lead to a "cliff edge" of risk when users turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the inability of the Silicon Valley to build tools that are secure and suitable for children," stated a influential online safety campaigner.

The US: A Fragmented Approach

Stateside, action is primarily unfolding at the local government level due to national stalemate.

• Utah demands guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and controls late-night use.
• Florida has signed a law banning those below 14 from joining social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a rule limiting minors to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with any further access dependent on adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also enacted laws demanding guardian approval for teenagers to set up social media presences.

Despite widespread concern and calls from some individuals to follow this path, a US-wide ban is currently seen as improbable.

International Views

Outside of these regions, other countries are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia intends to restrict social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has increased the required age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, global bodies take a more cautious position. Unicef has advised that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "might backfire". The agency notes that online platforms can be a "critical link" for marginalized young people and that government action should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to invest in user protection.

As this global conversation evolves, the steps of this nation and its followers demonstrate that policymakers around the world are increasingly prepared to wait for the industry to self-regulate.