🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision over how to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Graveyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Along the coast lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families are calling for more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to proceed for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.